B

Supply Chain Environmental Evidence Renewal Workspace

4.25

Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

이소영

Market

OpenTag — 팀 협업 채널에 내장되는 업무 제품 범위

Workflow

inferred: 대기업 납품 중소 제조사 품질 담당자 — 고객사별 환경 설문과 인증서 유효기간을 매주 확인하고 동일 수치를 여러 양식에 다시 입력하는 작업

Problem

Small and midsize manufacturers supplying large enterprises repeatedly submit energy-use data, raw-material information, and certificates in formats that vary by customer. Sales and quality teams reconcile current figures and expiration dates across Slack and Sheets, forcing them to re-enter the same information into multiple forms while bearing the risk of missed renewals.

Solution

The product maintains a shared environmental-data ledger, lets teams update customer-specific requirements, owners, and certificate expiration dates through Slack, and exports submission packages. As submission and rejection histories accumulate, the business builds a proprietary mapping of each buyer's required fields and accepted evidence.

Target: 대기업 3곳 이상에 납품하는 직원 20~200명 규모 국내 부품 제조사 — 품질보증 책임자와 B2B 영업 담당자
Revenue Model: KRW 120,000 per site per month, plus KRW 5,000 for each customer submission package beyond 20
Ecosystem Role: -
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
5.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
21.2/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (63/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
18.0/20
Revenue Signals
12.0/15
Pick-Axe Fit
13.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Dashboard