B

Labor Dispute Procedure Evidence Pass SaaS

4.30

Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

노란봉투법

Market

Ticket Fairy CLI — 행사 생성·티켓 발급·체크인 자동화

Workflow

inferred: 인사·노무 담당자 — 교섭 참석자 자격, 통지 열람, 서명부와 회의 증적을 반복 대조

Problem

Mid-sized manufacturers and their multi-tier suppliers must separately prove who attended negotiations, when notices were issued, and whether documents were received whenever interpretations of dispute scope or employer responsibility change. HR and labor relations teams manually reconcile emails, sign-in sheets, and calendar records to prepare evidence for disputes.

Solution

The service issues invitation passes for each negotiation or briefing session and preserves attendee eligibility, notice-viewing records, QR check-ins, and document versions in a single evidence package. As case histories accumulate, they form a dedicated data asset that reveals recurring issues and procedural omissions by worksite.

Target: 협력사 20곳 이상을 둔 국내 제조·물류 중견기업 — 인사팀 노무 담당자와 사내 변호사
Revenue Model: KRW 150,000 per worksite per month, plus KRW 50,000 per active labor dispute case per month
Ecosystem Role: -
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
5.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
21.2/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (74/100)

Competition
10.0/20
Market Demand
20.0/20
Timing
18.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Dashboard