B

Facility Infectious Disease Early Detection and Isolation Protocol Automation SaaS

4.05

Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

시니어케어 규제준수·행정보고 자동화 — 노인복지법 보고 의무 증가

Market

Infection Control Results(ICR) — 시설 감염관리 SaaS 해외 검증

Workflow

수기 바이탈 기록·교대 인수인계 누락 → 집단감염 초기 대응 2~3일 지연

Problem

In senior residences, shift nurses manually record residents' fever and respiratory symptoms. Frequent omissions during shift handovers cause missed early signs of cluster infections, leading to operational suspensions and fines amounting to tens of millions of won. After an infection occurs, manually writing epidemiological investigation reports takes 20 hours per week.

Solution

When shift nurses record resident vitals (temperature, oxygen saturation) via mobile check-in, the system automatically detects cluster patterns (2+ fevers on the same floor) and triggers isolation protocols. Epidemiological investigation report templates are auto-generated. Embedded in the facility's daily infection control routine, making it difficult to remove.

Target: Senior residences and nursing homes (100+ beds) — Infection control nurses, facility directors
Revenue Model: Monthly ₩30,000 (approx. $22.50) per facility (100 residents) + ₩200 (approx. $0.15) per additional resident — annual contract
Ecosystem Role: -
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (81%)

Tech Complexity
40.0/40
Data Availability
21.2/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (61/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
18.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
12.0/15
Solo Buildability
6.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Dashboard