Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

하이브리드 좌석·회의실 예약 엔진

Market

Robin / Skedda — 예약은 지원하나 노쇼 자동 감지·재배정 기능 미비

Workflow

총무팀의 회의실 노쇼 수동 확인·재배정·패널티 부과 병목

Problem

Hybrid companies' facility management teams face chronic shortage of actually available meeting rooms due to no-shows (averaging over 30%). Detecting no-shows requires manual checks after the reservation time, and reassignment and penalty enforcement are also manual, so the issue is effectively left unaddressed.

Solution

Based on occupancy sensors or calendar check-in data, automatically flags a no-show if no check-in occurs within 10 minutes of the reservation, auto-reassigns the slot to waitlisted users, and imposes booking restrictions on repeat no-shows. Input: calendar API + occupancy sensor/check-in data. Output: auto-reassignment notifications + no-show statistics dashboard + penalty rule engine.

Target: Facility management teams at companies with 200+ employees / meeting room operations managers at coworking spaces

Revenue Model: Monthly subscription — 30,000 KRW (approx. $22.50) for up to 10 meeting rooms, 70,000 KRW (approx. $52.50) for up to 30, and 150,000 KRW (approx. $112.50) for unlimited.

Ecosystem Role: -

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

3.0/5

U Urgency

5.0/5

M Market

4.0/5

R Realizability

5.0/5

V Validation

3.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (81%)

Tech Complexity

40.0/40

Data Availability

21.2/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (57/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

6.2/20

Timing

14.0/20

Revenue Signals

10.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

11.2/15

Solo Buildability

7.5/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.