B

Field-Specific Pest & Weather Integrated Alert SaaS

4.05

Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

농산물 출하시기·가격예측 SaaS (기상·작황 데이터 결합 의사결정 도구 부재)

Market

농업 기상 서비스(aWhere, Climavision) — 필지 단위 마이크로 알림 특화

Workflow

스마트팜 노코드 제어 대시보드 (IoT 센서·자동화 조작 병목의 확장)

Problem

Farmers must check pest forecasts from the Rural Development Administration, weather alerts from the Korea Meteorological Administration, and provincial agricultural technology center notices on separate sites and apps, making it difficult to determine if they apply to their own fields. Missing the optimal spraying window by just one day can spread damage 3-5 times, resulting in annual losses of several million won (approx. $1,500–$3,750).

Solution

When a farmer registers their field address and crop type, the service combines Korea Meteorological Administration API, pest forecast data, and satellite NDVI to calculate a daily risk score for their specific field, sending spraying timing alerts via KakaoTalk notification. It also recommends pesticides and application rates when risk is high.

Target: Open-field vegetable and fruit farmers (cultivation area of 1,000 pyeong or more, approx. 3,300 sqm) + crop group leaders
Revenue Model: Monthly Subscription: 30,000 KRW (approx. $22.50) for up to 3 fields / Premium: 50,000 KRW (approx. $37.50) per month (unlimited fields + pesticide recommendations + satellite analysis)
Ecosystem Role: -
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (81%)

Tech Complexity
40.0/40
Data Availability
21.2/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (58/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
16.0/20
Revenue Signals
9.0/15
Pick-Axe Fit
12.0/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Dashboard