B

My Cryptocurrency Inheritance Scenario Planner

3.25

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Clarity Act — acceleration of crypto asset institutionalization
→
Step 2 Tax uncertainty for inheritance and gifting among crypto asset holders in their 50s
→
Step 3 Integrated scenario design for wallet access + taxes + reporting procedures during inheritance

Problem

When a crypto asset holder in their 50s wants to transfer assets to a spouse or children in preparation for sudden accidents or illness, there is no single source of information covering wallet passwords, seed phrase transfer methods, valuation for inheritance tax as of the assessment date, and inheritance application procedures that differ by exchange. It is even unclear how to report crypto assets on the National Tax Service inheritance tax return, so hiring a tax accountant costs 1-3 million KRW (approx. $750-$2,250) per case, and finding a tax accountant specializing in crypto assets is difficult.

Solution

On the web, users select their exchanges, wallet types, and asset types, and the service provides step-by-step: (1) inheritance application procedures and required document checklists by exchange, (2) inheritance tax base amount simulation (automatic calculation of valuation as of inheritance date), and (3) secure seed phrase and password transfer guides (including legally valid will templates). It compares tax scenarios based on the 2026 crypto asset taxation implementation standards.

Target: Household heads aged 48-60 with crypto assets (Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.) worth 10 million KRW or more (approx. $7,500) and a spouse or adult children
Revenue Model: Basic procedure guide and checklist are free. Personalized inheritance tax simulation report: 5,000 KRW (approx. $3.75) per report. Will template + seed phrase storage guide package: 19,000 KRW (approx. $14.25).
Ecosystem Role: Regulation
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
3.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (61%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
17.1/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (56/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium]
Dashboard