B
Redevelopment & Reconstruction Impact Alert for My Home
2.95
Derivation Chain
Step 1
Public data on land management + surging interest in real estate
→
Step 2
Anxiety over whether homes of those in their 50s are included in redevelopment zones
→
Step 3
Tracking the real impact on my home at each redevelopment stage (relocation timing, compensation, contribution)
Problem
For homeowners aged 50-60 who actually reside in their homes, redevelopment and reconstruction are matters that can determine more than half of their assets, but it is extremely difficult to understand the current progress. The redevelopment process goes through 8+ stages: basic plan → designation of redevelopment zone → establishment of association → project implementation approval → management disposition approval → relocation → groundbreaking → occupancy, and announcements for each stage are scattered across Seoul city, district offices, and association websites. To check 'whether my home is included in a redevelopment zone', 'what stage it is currently at', and 'estimated contribution amount', one must visit the district office or ask a real estate agency, and information asymmetry often leads to losses.
Solution
By entering an address on the web, it immediately checks whether the location is included in a redevelopment/reconstruction/remodeling project zone, and if so, shows the current progress stage, recent announcements/notices, and estimated timeline (relocation timing, groundbreaking, occupancy) as a timeline. It sends notifications (email/KakaoTalk) when the stage changes, and also provides estimated contribution amount ranges based on similar cases as reference information.
NUMR-V Scores
NUMR-V Scoring System
| N Novelty | 1-5 | How uncommon the service is in market context. |
| U Urgency | 1-5 | How urgently users need this problem solved now. |
| M Market | 1-5 | Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators. |
| R Realizability | 1-5 | Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints. |
| V Validation | 1-5 | Validation signal quality from competition and demand data. |
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20
Feasibility (62%)
Data Availability
17.9/25
Feasibility Breakdown
| Tech Complexity | / 40 | Difficulty of core implementation stack. |
| Data Availability | / 25 | Practical availability and cost of required data. |
| MVP Timeline | / 20 | Expected time to ship a usable MVP. |
| API Bonus | / 15 | Bonus for viable public API leverage. |
Market Validation (56/100)
Validation Breakdown
| Competition | / 20 | Signal quality from competitor landscape. |
| Market Demand | / 20 | Demand proxies from search and mention patterns. |
| Timing | / 20 | Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation. |
| Revenue Signals | / 15 | Reference evidence for monetization viability. |
| Pick-Axe Fit | / 15 | How well the concept serves participants in a trend. |
| Solo Buildability | / 10 | Practicality for lean-team implementation. |
Technical Requirements
Frontend [medium]
Backend [medium]
Data Pipeline [medium]