B

My Rights Checklist under the Labor Union Act Amendment

3.55

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Settlement of Articles 2 and 3 of the Labor Union Act in the field
Step 2 Difficulty for production workers in their 50s to understand changes in rights under the amended Labor Union Act
Step 3 Need to recalculate retirement pay and compensation based on the amended law

Problem

Workers in their 50s in manufacturing and service industries need to read the official gazette and Ministry of Labor explanations written in legal terminology to understand how their bargaining rights, dispute rights, and scope of protection against unfair labor practices have changed due to the amendment of Articles 2 and 3 of the Labor Union Act. This takes more than half a day to understand the differences before and after the amendment. As a result, they may miss favorable provisions during collective bargaining or make disadvantageous agreements in pre-retirement compensation negotiations, leading to financial losses.

Solution

On the web, users select their employment type (regular/non-regular/special employment) and industry, and the service displays a comparison table of rights changes applicable to them before and after the amendment, and automatically generates a checklist for retirement and compensation negotiations. It also provides plain-language Korean translations of the relevant provisions from the amended law.

Target: Workers aged 48-58 in manufacturing and logistics, 3-5 years before mandatory retirement, regardless of union membership.
Revenue Model: Basic rights comparison table is free. Custom retirement negotiation checklist PDF download: 5,000 KRW per transaction (approx. $3.75). Referral fee for connecting with labor attorneys.
Ecosystem Role: Regulation
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (73%)

Tech Complexity
34.7/40
Data Availability
18.8/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (58/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
16.0/20
Revenue Signals
9.0/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
8.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [low] Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [low]
Dashboard