A
Public Data Cloud Migration Progress Dashboard
3.90
Derivation Chain
Step 1
Public data cloud migration policy
→
Step 2
Rapid increase in SI companies performing migration projects
→
Step 3
Lack of tools for SI companies to manage migration progress, quality, and schedule
Problem
SME SI companies (10-50 employees) performing public data cloud migration projects manually manage the migration progress, data consistency verification results, and security classification status of dozens of datasets in Excel, and a single PM spends 8-12 hours per week preparing weekly reports. When migration omissions or consistency errors are discovered during the client's acceptance inspection, 2-4 weeks of rework are required.
Solution
Import the list of datasets to be migrated, and provide a Kanban dashboard that automatically tracks progress by migration stage (mapping → transfer → verification → security review). Automatically verify data count and schema consistency, display security classification results in real time, and generate weekly reports for the client with one click.
NUMR-V Scores
NUMR-V Scoring System
| N Novelty | 1-5 | How uncommon the service is in market context. |
| U Urgency | 1-5 | How urgently users need this problem solved now. |
| M Market | 1-5 | Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators. |
| R Realizability | 1-5 | Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints. |
| V Validation | 1-5 | Validation signal quality from competition and demand data. |
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20
Feasibility (70%)
Data Availability
20.6/25
Feasibility Breakdown
| Tech Complexity | / 40 | Difficulty of core implementation stack. |
| Data Availability | / 25 | Practical availability and cost of required data. |
| MVP Timeline | / 20 | Expected time to ship a usable MVP. |
| API Bonus | / 15 | Bonus for viable public API leverage. |
Market Validation (61/100)
Validation Breakdown
| Competition | / 20 | Signal quality from competitor landscape. |
| Market Demand | / 20 | Demand proxies from search and mention patterns. |
| Timing | / 20 | Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation. |
| Revenue Signals | / 15 | Reference evidence for monetization viability. |
| Pick-Axe Fit | / 15 | How well the concept serves participants in a trend. |
| Solo Buildability | / 10 | Practicality for lean-team implementation. |
Technical Requirements
Backend [medium]
Frontend [medium]
Data Pipeline [low]