B

My District Legislator Report Card

3.20

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Seo Myung-ok ethics committee referral
→
Step 2 Difficulty accessing legislator activity information
→
Step 3 At-a-glance view of my district representative's actual performance

Problem

Working professionals in their 50s who want to check their district representative's actual bill sponsorship record, plenary session attendance, and ethics disciplinary history must search across 5+ separate sites including the National Assembly Bill Information System, session minutes, and news outlets, taking over 2 hours. They briefly pay attention during elections but face a 4-year information gap for the rest of the term.

Solution

Select a district or proportional representative to automatically collect and display a monthly report card covering bills sponsored and passage rate, plenary attendance rate, standing committee speaking frequency, ethics committee referrals/disciplinary history, and budget review participation. Includes comparison with the previous term's representative.

Target: Ages 45-60, working professionals and self-employed individuals who regularly consume political news but cannot track legislative activities, citizens who vote every election
Revenue Model: Free web service (basic report card access). Premium: detailed per-legislator analysis PDF download at $1.50 per report, tracked legislator change alerts subscription at $2.93/month
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
3.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (62%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
17.9/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (54/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
9.4/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
7.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
7.5/15
Solo Buildability
8.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium] Data Pipeline [medium]
Dashboard