A

Checkup Action Planner

4.00

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Health Checkup follow-up actions
→
Step 2 Difficulty interpreting checkup result values
→
Step 3 Even after interpretation, unable to prioritize which specialty to visit and by when

Problem

When a 52-year-old office worker receives their comprehensive health checkup results, 15-20 metrics are listed—liver enzymes (GGT/AST/ALT), blood sugar (fasting/HbA1c), blood pressure, cholesterol, etc.—but there's no clear guidance on which values require 'monitoring' versus 'immediate medical attention.' During the 4-6 week average wait for a follow-up, anxiety builds, and visiting a local clinic often yields nothing more than 'go see a bigger hospital.'

Solution

Enter your checkup results and the system classifies each metric into three urgency tiers (Immediate / Within 4 Weeks / Monitor) based on Korean Medical Association standards, showing recommended specialties, test names, and estimated costs for each item. When previous year's results are entered, it visualizes trends and rate of deterioration.

Target: Office workers aged 45-60 who undergo annual national or comprehensive health checkups, with borderline pre-chronic conditions
Revenue Model: Basic analysis of 3 items free. Full analysis + personalized follow-up action Report at ~$2.25 per transaction. Annual tracking Subscription at ~$2.15/month.
Ecosystem Role: Consumer
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (68%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
18.3/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (72/100)

Competition
10.0/20
Market Demand
20.0/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [low]
Dashboard