B

DebtClearPath

3.60

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Small business closure and transition guide
Step 2 Integrated business closure procedure guidance
Step 3 Post-closure personal debt resolution and credit recovery paths

Problem

Self-employed individuals in their 50s who have closed their business must simultaneously settle multiple debts — business loans, card merchant receivables, lease security deposit returns, and employee severance pay — but don't understand debt priority rules (wage claims > taxes > general claims) or the differences between resolution paths like personal rehabilitation, workout programs, or Credit Recovery Committee. This leads to worst-case choices. Legal consultant fees run $225-375 (~300,000-500,000 KRW) per session.

Solution

Users enter debt items with amounts, creditors, and delinquency periods. The system auto-sorts debts by legal repayment priority and recommends the best debt resolution path (voluntary agreement / workout / personal rehabilitation / bankruptcy) based on the user's situation. Each path's estimated timeline, credit score impact, and required documents are summarized on a single page.

Target: Aged 48-62, former Small Business Owners with total debts of $22,500-$150,000 (~30 million-200 million KRW) after business closure, who don't know their debt resolution options
Revenue Model: Debt resolution path comparison is Free. Per-path required document checklist + auto-filled application forms: $7.50 (~9,900 KRW) Per Transaction. Legal consultant referral fee on connection.
Ecosystem Role: Education
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (72%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
23.1/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (54/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [low]
Dashboard