B

Business Closure & Restart Admin Roadmap

3.20

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Career-based small business and Freelancer transition
→
Step 2 Recovery after self-employment failure
→
Step 3 Business closure filing → delinquent tax settlement → re-startup support fund connection admin sequence

Problem

When a 52-year-old Self-employed cafe owner wants to close after 3 years of operation, there are 10+ administrative procedures including business closure filing (HomeTax) → VAT final return → social insurance deregistration → lease deposit recovery → remaining inventory disposal → delinquent tax installment application. Getting the order wrong incurs penalties. After closure, government support programs like 'Second Chance Special Funds' exist for re-startups, but applicants must first complete credit recovery procedures during the closure phase to qualify — a chain of prerequisites most people don't know about.

Solution

Users enter their business type, planned closure date, delinquency status, and debt level on the web. The tool automatically generates a timeline from closure → settlement → restart with all administrative procedures. It visualizes dependencies showing 'you must complete this step before the next one becomes available.' The connected path from credit recovery → restart funding → re-startup training is displayed in a single view.

Target: Self-employed aged 45–58, considering or recently completed business closure, carrying debt, with intention to restart
Revenue Model: Basic roadmap free. Detailed customized guide (delinquent tax installment strategy + support fund eligibility assessment + document checklist) at $7.40 per transaction (9,900 KRW). CPA and attorney matching.
Ecosystem Role: Regulation
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
2.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
20.8/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (55/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
9.0/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium]
Dashboard