B

Small Business Goodwill Calculator

3.50

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Small business digital operations
→
Step 2 Opaque goodwill valuation standards during closure or transfer
→
Step 3 Fair value calculation based on same-industry, same-district goodwill transaction data

Competitor references

No usable source links are available for this idea. Its signal notes and scores need independent verification.

Problem

When a 55-year-old Restaurant owner needs to transfer their business due to health issues, there's no standard for setting the goodwill price. Real estate agents inflate goodwill to increase their commission, or deflate it to push a quick sale. While the Commercial Lease Protection Act protects goodwill rights, it provides no formula for calculating 'fair goodwill.' Hiring a professional appraiser costs $750-$2,250 (~1,000,000-3,000,000 KRW). As a result, relying on gut feeling commonly leads to losses of $3,750-$15,000 (~5,000,000-20,000,000 KRW).

Solution

Users input business type, location (address), revenue, years in operation, and interior investment amount. The tool calculates a fair goodwill range based on actual transaction data from the same commercial district and business type. It breaks down the three components — business rights, facility rights, and location premium (license rights) — and also applies the National Tax Service's business goodwill valuation method for cross-reference.

Target: Ages 50-62, business owners planning to sell or acquire a small business (Restaurant, Cafe, salon, retail shop)
Revenue Model: Basic fair range estimate free; detailed valuation Report (with comparable cases) $15 Per Transaction (~19,900 KRW); including transfer contract template $22.50 (~29,900 KRW)
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (70%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
20.8/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (54/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [low] Data Pipeline [medium]
Dashboard