No usable source links are available for this idea. Its signal notes and scores need independent verification.
With codified indemnity standards, proving 'absence of intent or gross negligence' requires systematic records of public data usage history (call timestamps, processing methods, distribution scope). Small dev teams lack the capacity to build dedicated audit logs, leaving them without evidence to support indemnity claims in disputes. Inadequate logs can lead to litigation costs exceeding $7,500 (~1,000만원).
Provides middleware that proxies public data API calls while automatically logging usage history (timestamps, source version, processing logic hashes), and generates indemnity-proof Reports with one click.
| N Novelty | 1-5 | How uncommon the service is in market context. |
| U Urgency | 1-5 | How urgently users need this problem solved now. |
| M Market | 1-5 | Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators. |
| R Realizability | 1-5 | Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints. |
| V Validation | 1-5 | Validation signal quality from competition and demand data. |
| Tech Complexity | / 40 | Difficulty of core implementation stack. |
| Data Availability | / 25 | Practical availability and cost of required data. |
| MVP Timeline | / 20 | Expected time to ship a usable MVP. |
| API Bonus | / 15 | Bonus for viable public API leverage. |
| Competition | / 20 | Signal quality from competitor landscape. |
| Market Demand | / 20 | Demand proxies from search and mention patterns. |
| Timing | / 20 | Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation. |
| Revenue Signals | / 15 | Reference evidence for monetization viability. |
| Pick-Axe Fit | / 15 | How well the concept serves participants in a trend. |
| Solo Buildability | / 10 | Practicality for lean-team implementation. |