B

Youth Culture Pass Settlement Bot

3.35

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Youth Culture & Arts Pass expansion
→
Step 2 Culture pass merchant settlement management
→
Step 3 Merchant settlement automation and revenue analytics

Problem

Small-scale venues (bookstores, indie theaters, galleries) with annual revenue of $75,000-225,000 (~1-3억원) that participate in municipal Youth Culture & Arts Pass programs (e.g., Jeonju's ₩200,000/~$150 pass) must manually compile monthly settlement records and submit them in each municipality's different required format. Each merchant spends an average of 4-6 hours per month on settlement paperwork, and errors cause an average 2-week settlement delay that worsens cash flow.

Solution

Integrates with POS/card sales data to automatically separate and aggregate Youth Pass transactions, then generates auto-formatted settlement reports matching each municipality's requirements. Provides pre-submission error detection alerts and a monthly Pass revenue trend dashboard, reducing merchant administrative burden by 90%.

Target: Youth Culture & Arts Pass merchant operators of small cultural venues (bookstores, indie theaters, galleries), 1-5 employees, annual revenue $75,000-225,000 (~1-3억원)
Revenue Model: SaaS Monthly Subscription $21.75/merchant/month (~2.9만원), 20% discount for annual Billing. $14.25/location/month (~1.9만원) for 5+ multi-location operators
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
2.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (64%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
15.0/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (54/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
7.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
8.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [low] Data pipeline [medium]
Dashboard