B

Stock News Regulatory Risk Detector

3.35

Derivation Chain

Step 1 KOSPI surge & semiconductor stock volatility
→
Step 2 Need for regulatory risk monitoring on investment holdings
→
Step 3 Policy/regulatory change impact analysis service for individual stocks

Problem

Individual investors holding semiconductor and AI-related stocks struggle to assess how policy changes — U.S. export controls, Korea's Semiconductor Special Act, EU AI regulations — impact their holdings. Legislative proposals from the National Assembly, Ministry of Economy enforcement decree revisions, and U.S. Department of Commerce notices are scattered across multiple channels. Over 80% of investors only learn about regulatory risks after a stock price crash.

Solution

Automatically monitors domestic and international regulatory/policy changes that may affect the user's holdings. Crawls Korea's National Assembly Bill Information System, Ministry of Economy/Industry press releases, and the U.S. Federal Register, then uses an LLM to assess stock relevance. Delivers alerts for high-relevance regulatory changes with summaries and impact analysis.

Target: Individual investors aged 30–50 holding stocks in regulation-sensitive sectors (semiconductors, AI, biotech)
Revenue Model: SaaS Monthly Subscription: ₩6,900/month (~$5) per account (up to 5 stocks), Premium (international regulations + unlimited stocks) ₩12,900/month (~$10)
Ecosystem Role: Regulation
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (72%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
22.5/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (57/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
16.0/20
Revenue Signals
9.0/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Data Pipeline [medium] AI/ML [medium] Frontend [low]
Dashboard