B

Container-Level Chemical Co-Storage Risk SaaS

4.10

Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

공장

Market

inferred: SDS·화학물질 재고관리 소프트웨어 카테고리

Workflow

inferred: 화학공장 창고담당자 — 입고 원료의 SDS 위험등급과 현재 보관 위치를 건별로 대조

Problem

Small chemical plants often manage incoming-material SDS records and physical storage locations in separate files, creating a risk that prohibited material combinations will be placed in the same area. Warehouse staff must manually compare documents with current shelf conditions whenever materials arrive.

Solution

The service registers each material container's barcode, hazard classification, quantity, and storage zone, then immediately flags prohibited combinations and zone-limit violations while maintaining a movement history. Over time, movement, warning, and near-miss records reveal site-specific co-storage risk patterns.

Target: 위험물 SKU 30~500개를 취급하는 중소 화학·도료 제조사 — 자재관리자와 안전관리자
Revenue Model: KRW 120,000 per site per month, plus KRW 100 per month for each active container above 1,000
Ecosystem Role: -
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
21.2/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (74/100)

Competition
10.0/20
Market Demand
20.0/20
Timing
16.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
12.0/15
Solo Buildability
6.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Dashboard