Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

DPP 공급망 증빙 수집 자동화 — 바이어·규제 양측의 증빙 요구 증가

Market

RFP/보안·실사 문항 자동응답(Response Management) 카테고리 — G2 상위 제품 scope

Workflow

해외영업 pain: 바이어마다 겹치는 실사 문항지를 매번 처음부터 재작성

Problem

Each EU buyer sends a sustainability and supply chain due diligence questionnaire with 40–150 questions. The content overlaps by 80%, but the wording and order differ, so we start from scratch every time. The supporting files to attach to each answer are also scattered across the responsible person's local folders.

Solution

By indexing past answers and attached evidence by question meaning, when a new questionnaire is uploaded, existing answers are matched and the draft is filled in, leaving the person in charge to only review and confirm. Each time an answer is approved, the company's official answer assets accumulate, continuously increasing the reuse rate.

Target: SME manufacturers and parts suppliers supplying large EU buyers — overseas sales support staff, quality/ESG dual-role practitioners

Revenue Model: Monthly subscription — 50,000 KRW/month (approx. $37.50) for 3 users and 5 questionnaires/month, Team Plan 290,000 KRW/month (approx. $217.50) with unlimited questionnaires

Ecosystem Role: -

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

2.0/5

U Urgency

4.0/5

M Market

3.0/5

R Realizability

5.0/5

V Validation

5.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (81%)

Tech Complexity

40.0/40

Data Availability

21.2/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (58/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

6.2/20

Timing

16.0/20

Revenue Signals

9.0/15

Pick-Axe Fit

10.5/15

Solo Buildability

8.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.