B

Narcotics Inventory Auto-Reconciliation & Audit Trail Micro SaaS

4.20

Signal Sources (v8 Triple Source)

Trigger

조제 워크플로우 자동화 SaaS

Market

의약품 유통기한·콜드체인 실시간 추적 인프라

Workflow

조제·검수·라벨링 단계 통합 관리 수요 — 마약류 별도 관리 비효율

Problem

Amendments to the Narcotics Control Act require pharmacies to electronically record and store narcotics ledgers, but existing pharmacy software lacks narcotics-specific features, so pharmacists manage them in separate Excel sheets or handwritten ledgers. During the annual audit by the pharmaceutical association, insufficient evidence creates a constant risk of fines.

Solution

Automatically reconcile narcotics receipts (via wholesale e-tax invoice integration), dispensing (automatic deduction from prescriptions), and remaining stock, and auto-generate the ledger in the legally required format. Provide immediate alerts and cause-tracking logs for inventory discrepancies.

Target: Independent pharmacists (pharmacies handling narcotics, ~70% of all pharmacies) + pharmacy chain compliance officers
Revenue Model: Monthly subscription: 29,000 KRW (~$21.75) per single pharmacy; for chains with 5+ locations, 20,000 KRW (~$15) per location per month
Ecosystem Role: -
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
21.2/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (60/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
18.0/20
Revenue Signals
9.0/15
Pick-Axe Fit
12.0/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Dashboard