B

Digital Legacy Organizer for Parents

3.55

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Surge in AI and digital services
→
Step 2 Post-mortem organization problem due to the surge in digital accounts among middle-aged and older adults
→
Step 3 A system for individuals to organize their digital asset list during their lifetime and pass it on to family

Problem

Active internet users aged 55-65 have an average of 30-50 online accounts (financial, shopping, social media, subscription services, cloud storage), but in the event of their death, their families are not even aware of these accounts. Unresolved paid subscriptions continue to be auto-charged monthly, and photos and documents stored in the cloud become permanently inaccessible. Currently, there is no Korean-language service to systematically organize this, so people rely on insecure methods like writing passwords in notepads or on paper.

Solution

An encrypted web service that allows users to register their digital accounts, subscriptions, and assets by category and grant designated family members viewing access. Key features: (1) registration and notes by account type (financial/shopping/SNS/subscription/cloud), (2) does not store passwords but only records hints on 'where to find them', (3) sends access instructions to designated family members via email/text. Differentiator: minimizes security risk by not storing passwords themselves.

Target: Retirees-to-be aged 55-65 with multiple online accounts who want to pass on digital asset information to their spouse or adult children.
Revenue Model: Free for up to 10 accounts. Unlimited registration + family sharing for 2,900 KRW/month (approximately $2.20). PDF summary download: 1,900 KRW per download (approximately $1.40).
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
3.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (74%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
24.4/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (66/100)

Competition
10.0/20
Market Demand
20.0/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
7.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
7.5/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium] Infrastructure [low]
Dashboard