B

Integrated School Administrative Calendar for Parents in Their 40s

3.05

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Public administration education data opening
→
Step 2 School administrative management for children of dual-income couples in their 40s
→
Step 3 Problem of missing schedules due to scattered school, academy, and local government education calendars

Problem

Dual-income couples in their 40s-50s with two middle or high school children must check school events (performance assessments, parent-teacher conferences, after-school class registration, meal fee payments, etc.), cram school test schedules, and local government education program registration deadlines across different apps (e-Learning Center, school website, academy apps, local government apps). Missing registration deadlines leads to losing popular after-school classes or not being able to take leave for parent-teacher conferences, occurring 3-4 times per semester.

Solution

On the web, users register their children's school and cram school, and the service automatically collects school events, tests, payments, and conference schedules into a family-shared calendar. Key features: (1) automatic parsing of school website notices to extract schedules, (2) simultaneous alerts to both parents 3 days before registration deadlines, (3) monthly view with filtering by child and type.

Target: Dual-income couples aged 40-50, with 1-2 middle or high school children, office workers who find it difficult to check school schedules frequently during work.
Revenue Model: Free for one child. Additional child at 2,900 KRW/month (approximately $2.18). Also earns advertising revenue from partnerships with cram schools.
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
2.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
20.8/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (54/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium] Data Pipeline [medium]
Dashboard