A

Portrait Rights Violation Evidence Collector

4.35

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Seo Myung-ok portrait rights violation controversy
→
Step 2 Portrait rights violation response for ordinary citizens

Competitor references

No usable source links are available for this idea. Its signal notes and scores need independent verification.

Problem

Self-employed individuals and working professionals in their 50s whose faces or businesses are photographed and posted on SNS, YouTube, or blogs without consent don't know where or how to file complaints, nor how to preserve evidence (screenshots, URLs, posting dates). With different procedures for the Korea Communications Standards Commission, Cyber Investigation Unit, and each platform, most give up after wasting 3-5 days.

Solution

Enter the infringing URL to automatically capture screenshots, metadata, and posting timestamps, generating an evidence package. Auto-fills platform-specific takedown request forms (YouTube/Instagram/Naver, etc.) and drafts complaint documents for the Communications Standards Commission and police.

Target: Ages 40-60, self-employed individuals (victims of unauthorized store photography) or working professionals (victims of unauthorized SNS tagging/photography), non-experts with limited legal knowledge
Revenue Model: Free: 3 evidence captures/month. Paid: unlimited captures + auto-generated complaint forms at $3.68/month. Legal consultation referral commission.
Ecosystem Role: Supplier
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
4.0/5
U Urgency
5.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
5.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (78%)

Tech Complexity
34.7/40
Data Availability
23.3/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (52/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
3.8/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [low] Data Pipeline [low]
Dashboard