B

Barrier-Free Screening Request Hub

3.15

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Expansion of barrier-free film screenings
→
Step 2 Barrier-free content production infrastructure
→
Step 3 Subtitle & audio description production SaaS
→
Step 4 Screening event administration automation

Problem

When local governments and welfare centers want to host barrier-free film screenings, they must manually handle 5-7 administrative steps: negotiating film copyrights, pre-registering disabled audience members, sourcing assistive devices (FM transmitters/receivers, braille guides), and filing performance reports to the Ministry of Culture. A single staff member spends 15-20 hours per screening, and approximately 30% of subsidy settlements are rejected due to missing documents.

Solution

Automatically generates step-by-step checklists for screening event workflows, and produces copyright agreement templates, audience pre-registration forms, and subsidy settlement reports with one click. Auto-generates performance reports formatted for Ministry of Culture and local government requirements, reducing settlement rejection rates to under 10%.

Target: Local government Culture & Sports Division officers, disability welfare center program coordinators (5-20 staff)
Revenue Model: SaaS Monthly Subscription $37/month per organization (~49,000 KRW), 20% discount for annual billing. Enterprise Plan for large municipalities (20+ screenings/year) at $112/month (~149,000 KRW)
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
3.0/5
M Market
2.0/5
R Realizability
4.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (73%)

Tech Complexity
32.0/40
Data Availability
20.6/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (56/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
9.4/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
7.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [low]
Dashboard