AI Jailbreak Defense Red Team Kit

4.20

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Rising AI model jailbreak threats

→

Step 2 Security teams at AI service operators

→

Step 3 Automated AI jailbreak scenario generation + defense testing tool

Problem

Korean companies operating AI chatbots and agents (Naver, Kakao, Startups, etc.) are exposed to prompt injection and jailbreak attacks, but manual defense testing takes 30-60 minutes per scenario. With the EU AI Act and Korea's AI Basic Act mandating safety evaluations, hundreds of test scenarios are now required quarterly.

Solution

Auto-generates attack scenarios reflecting the latest jailbreak techniques (multilingual bypass, role-play, token manipulation, etc.), batch-executes them against target AI model APIs, and produces vulnerability Reports. Automatically provides OWASP LLM Top 10 scorecards and remediation recommendations.

Target: Security/QA teams at AI Startups and mid-sized IT companies with 10-100 employees operating AI chatbot/agent services

Revenue Model: SaaS Monthly Subscription at 290,000 KRW/model (~$218/month, includes 500 scenarios/month), additional 100 scenarios at 30,000 KRW (~$23), 25% discount for annual contracts

Ecosystem Role: Regulation

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

4.0/5

U Urgency

5.0/5

M Market

4.0/5

R Realizability

4.0/5

V Validation

4.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (72%)

Tech Complexity

29.3/40

Data Availability

22.5/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (63/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

6.2/20

Timing

18.0/20

Revenue Signals

10.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

13.5/15

Solo Buildability

7.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] AI/ML [medium] Frontend [low]

Dashboard