No usable source links are available for this idea. Its signal notes and scores need independent verification.
With the enactment of the judicial misconduct law, citizens, media, and legal professionals want to verify judges' and prosecutors' past ruling tendencies, disciplinary records, and position transfers. However, this information is scattered across government gazettes, Supreme Court personnel announcements, and National Assembly transcripts, taking days to compile. A single reporter spends an average of 3–5 hours researching one judge.
Integrates crawling of government gazettes, Supreme Court personnel appointments, National Assembly transcripts, and court rulings to structure each judge's and prosecutor's career timeline (appointment → position → ruling tendencies → disciplinary actions), with search, filter, and comparison features.
| N Novelty | 1-5 | How uncommon the service is in market context. |
| U Urgency | 1-5 | How urgently users need this problem solved now. |
| M Market | 1-5 | Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators. |
| R Realizability | 1-5 | Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints. |
| V Validation | 1-5 | Validation signal quality from competition and demand data. |
| Tech Complexity | / 40 | Difficulty of core implementation stack. |
| Data Availability | / 25 | Practical availability and cost of required data. |
| MVP Timeline | / 20 | Expected time to ship a usable MVP. |
| API Bonus | / 15 | Bonus for viable public API leverage. |
| Competition | / 20 | Signal quality from competitor landscape. |
| Market Demand | / 20 | Demand proxies from search and mention patterns. |
| Timing | / 20 | Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation. |
| Revenue Signals | / 15 | Reference evidence for monetization viability. |
| Pick-Axe Fit | / 15 | How well the concept serves participants in a trend. |
| Solo Buildability | / 10 | Practicality for lean-team implementation. |