B

Post-Closure Re-Launch Grant Map

3.45

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Small self-employed business closure and transition guide
→
Step 2 Closure procedures + debt settlement
→
Step 3 Automatic eligibility matching for government re-launch grants after business closure

Problem

People in their 50s preparing to restart a business after closure must individually check eligibility across 8+ agencies — the Ministry of SMEs, Small Enterprise and Market Service, local governments, Ministry of Employment and Labor — each running different re-launch support programs (Second Chance Special Fund, Re-Launch Package, Fresh Start Fund, etc.). Each program has different application periods, eligibility requirements (time since closure, industry type, credit rating), grant amounts, and complex rules on whether benefits can be stacked.

Solution

A web tool where users input their closure date, previous industry, credit rating, desired new industry, and region of residence to see currently available re-launch support programs sorted by eligibility match score. It compares grant amounts, application deadlines, required documents, and benefit stacking eligibility on a single page.

Target: Ages 45-60, 6 months to 3 years post-closure, intending to restart but short on capital, former Small Business Owners who don't know what support is available
Revenue Model: Support program matching list free. Auto-generated application forms + document checklist at $6 per transaction. Expert consulting referral commission.
Ecosystem Role: Regulation
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
4.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
4.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (65%)

Tech Complexity
24.0/40
Data Availability
20.8/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (60/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
16.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
12.0/15
Solo Buildability
7.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [medium]
Dashboard