Commercial Code Reform Shareholder Rights Simulator

3.80

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Anti-stock-price-suppression act and Commercial Code reform debate

→

Step 2 Changes in listed company corporate governance

→

Step 3 Minority shareholder rights exercise simulation tool

→

Step 4 Shareholder activism consulting tool infrastructure

Problem

As Korea's Commercial Code amendments (anti-stock-price-suppression act, minority shareholder rights expansion) are being debated, over 3 million individual investors struggle to determine whether they can exercise new rights such as proxy voting, shareholder proposals, and director removal petitions for their holdings. Brokerage trading platforms lack such simulation features, so most investors either pay for legal consultations ($225–$375 per session) or simply give up.

Solution

(1) Auto-generate a list of exercisable shareholder rights upon entering stock holdings and ownership percentage (2) Compare rights changes across Commercial Code amendment scenarios (current law / Amendment A / Amendment B) (3) Auto-generate shareholder proposal and proxy statement templates.

Target: Individual investors aged 30–50 with stock holdings of $7,500+ (10 million KRW+), members of minority shareholder activism communities

Revenue Model: Premium — basic simulation free, document generation and legal review integration at $3.70/month per account (4,900 KRW)

Ecosystem Role: Education

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

4.0/5

U Urgency

4.0/5

M Market

4.0/5

R Realizability

4.0/5

V Validation

3.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (70%)

Tech Complexity

29.3/40

Data Availability

20.4/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (52/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

6.2/20

Timing

16.0/20

Revenue Signals

7.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

7.5/15

Solo Buildability

7.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium] AI/ML [low]

Dashboard