K-Moonshot Project Management Hub

3.20

Derivation Chain

Step 1 8-sector K-Moonshot national R&D programs launched

→

Step 2 Administrative burden on K-Moonshot project teams

→

Step 3 Integrated project progress, deliverables, and settlement management SaaS

Problem

Small research institutions and university labs (5-20 researchers) conducting national R&D projects like K-Moonshot must handle progress reports, research fund settlements, and deliverable tracking (papers, Patents, software registrations) across separate systems (IRIS, RCMS, e-R&D). Each quarter, one researcher spends 3-5 days writing reports — and format changes frequently force complete rewrites.

Solution

Auto-maps IRIS and RCMS reporting formats so researchers can enter progress data, labor costs, material expenses, and travel costs in a single dashboard, which auto-converts to each system's submission format. Monitors deliverables (papers, Patents) and budget execution rates in real time, with automated checklist alerts before settlement deadlines.

Target: Research administration staff at small national R&D institutions, university industry-academia cooperation office staff

Revenue Model: SaaS Monthly Subscription at 59,000 KRW (~$44)/project/month, 5+ project bundle at 199,000 KRW (~$149)/month, 15% discount for Annual Subscription

Ecosystem Role: Supplier

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

3.0/5

U Urgency

4.0/5

M Market

3.0/5

R Realizability

3.0/5

V Validation

3.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (72%)

Tech Complexity

29.3/40

Data Availability

23.1/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (52/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

3.8/20

Timing

14.0/20

Revenue Signals

10.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

10.5/15

Solo Buildability

5.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [low]

Dashboard