B

OTT Content Revenue Share Tracker

3.20

Derivation Chain

Step 1 OTT content hits (e.g., 'The Man Living with the King')
→
Step 2 OTT production company settlement infrastructure
→
Step 3 Real-time revenue share tracking per production company

Problem

Small-to-mid-sized production companies and independent producers who deliver content to OTT platforms must manually reconcile settlement statements each month. Since each platform uses different settlement criteria (view count vs. watch time vs. completion rate), verification takes an average of 8-12 hours per month. Settlement errors are discovered 2-3 months late, resulting in unrecovered revenue amounting to 3-5% of annual sales.

Solution

Upload settlement PDFs/Excel files from each OTT platform, and the system automatically parses them to visualize revenue shares by content and platform on a unified dashboard. It auto-converts between different settlement criteria for cross-checking and detects anomalies (e.g., high view counts but disproportionately low settlement amounts) with automated alerts.

Target: Small-to-mid-sized video production companies and independent producers with annual revenue of $3.75M-$37.5M (5-20 employees)
Revenue Model: SaaS Monthly Subscription: $37/month per account (10 titles or fewer), $74/month per account (50 titles or fewer), 15% discount for Annual Subscription
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (72%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
23.1/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (51/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
7.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium] AI/ML [low]
Dashboard