B

Municipal Competition Management SaaS

3.05

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Public data utilization island expo
→
Step 2 Competition operations administration
→
Step 3 Integrated competition submission, judging, and announcement management Platform

Competitor references

No usable source links are available for this idea. Its signal notes and scores need independent verification.

Problem

When local governments run public data competitions, they handle submissions (email/mail), judging (Excel), and results announcements (manual website posting) through separate channels. Each competition requires 2-3 government staff members dedicated to administrative work for 4-6 weeks, with an average of 2-3 incidents per year involving missed submissions, duplicates, or scoring errors.

Solution

Handles the entire workflow — from competition announcement creation, online submission, judge assignment, blind evaluation, to automated results publication — within a single SaaS Platform. Features include automatic submission numbering, automated judge conflict-of-interest detection, and auto-generated results statistics.

Target: Local government culture & tourism departments and IT officers (running 2-5 competitions per year), public institution innovation support teams
Revenue Model: 800,000 KRW (~$600) per competition (based on 100 participants); annual unlimited license at 3,000,000 KRW (~$2,250)
Ecosystem Role: Supplier
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
2.0/5
U Urgency
4.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
3.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20

Feasibility (70%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
20.6/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (59/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
9.4/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
12.0/15
Solo Buildability
5.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium] Infrastructure [low]
Dashboard