B

Delegation Safety Checklist

3.60

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Digital administrative and financial delegation management
→
Step 2 Security risks when delegating administrative tasks to children

Problem

When parents in their 60s want to delegate government portal, tax filing, or banking app tasks to their adult children, the reality is they end up sharing their entire digital certificate password or sending it via KakaoTalk. Information about which tasks can legally be delegated, where to get power-of-attorney forms, and which agencies support electronic delegation is fragmented across institutions, costing both parents and children 1–2 hours of searching each time.

Solution

A single-page reference consolidating delegable tasks, required documents, and electronic delegation availability by institution (Government24, HomeTax, top 4 banks, National Health Insurance Service, etc.). Users select a task type (tax filing, certificate issuance, account inquiry) and receive step-by-step delegation procedures with form download links for the relevant institution.

Target: Parents aged 58–68 and their adult children (30s–40s) who handle administrative tasks on their behalf, especially when the parent cannot visit in person due to health or distance
Revenue Model: Free web service. Auto-generated power-of-attorney PDF download (with name and ID number masking): ~$1.50 Per Transaction. Attorney and Tax Accounting professional referral commissions.
Ecosystem Role: Regulation
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
3.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
5.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (83%)

Tech Complexity
40.0/40
Data Availability
23.1/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (54/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
14.0/20
Revenue Signals
7.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
9.0/15
Solo Buildability
9.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [low] Backend [low]
Dashboard