AI Grant Awardee Post-Management Board

3.35

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Seoul Innovation Challenge AI company selection

→

Step 2 Post-selection program management process

→

Step 3 Awardee milestone tracking and performance reporting tool

Problem

Staff members (1–2 people) at government and municipal AI grant management agencies manually handle quarterly performance report collection, milestone tracking, and settlement document verification for 10–30 awarded companies. Each company's quarterly performance report takes 2–3 hours to process, with an additional 1–2 weeks needed to compile and write the consolidated Report. Significant communication overhead is spent chasing companies with missing or late submissions.

Solution

Awarded companies submit milestone progress and settlement documents online, while the management agency receives an auto-aggregated summary dashboard with alerts for flagged companies. Core features: (1) Per-company milestone Gantt chart with automated progress aggregation, (2) Automated settlement document verification (format compliance, cross-referencing amounts), (3) Auto-reminders for late/missing submissions and consolidated Report PDF generation.

Target: Program managers at government-funded project management agencies (IITP, KISED, Technoparks), municipal innovation program operations teams

Revenue Model: Per-program Billing: up to 10 awarded companies at $74/mo (~99,000 KRW), 11–30 companies at $149/mo (~199,000 KRW), customization available on request

Ecosystem Role: Supplier

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

3.0/5

U Urgency

3.0/5

M Market

2.0/5

R Realizability

4.0/5

V Validation

4.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (74%)

Tech Complexity

29.3/40

Data Availability

25.0/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (56/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

9.4/20

Timing

14.0/20

Revenue Signals

7.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

10.5/15

Solo Buildability

7.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Frontend [medium] AI/ML [low]

Dashboard