Shareholder Meeting Voting Assistant

3.65

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Samsung Electronics & SK Hynix AGM expectations

→

Step 2 Individual investor participation in shareholder meetings

→

Step 3 Voting decision support service for proxy voting

Problem

Individual investors holding major stocks like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix find it difficult to independently analyze the rationale for voting for or against agenda items (director appointments, dividend resolutions, articles of incorporation amendments, etc.) when casting electronic votes at shareholder meetings. Disclosure documents are written in legal jargon, and proxy advisory services like ISS and Daishin Economic Research Institute are exclusively available to institutional investors, leaving most retail investors to either abstain or blindly vote in favor.

Solution

Automatically collects and parses shareholder meeting agenda disclosures, summarizes key issues per agenda item in plain Korean, and displays historical data on passage rates and subsequent stock price impacts of similar past agenda items. Provides electronic voting deadline reminders and one-click electronic voting links.

Target: Individual stock investors aged 20-50 who are long-term holders of large-cap stocks, investment community members interested in shareholder activism

Revenue Model: Premium SaaS ~$14/month per account (~19K KRW, tracking up to 5 stocks), single analysis during AGM season ~$2.15 per item (~2.9K KRW)

Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

4.0/5

U Urgency

3.0/5

M Market

3.0/5

R Realizability

4.0/5

V Validation

4.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (68%)

Tech Complexity

29.3/40

Data Availability

18.8/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (66/100)

Competition

10.0/20

Market Demand

20.0/20

Timing

14.0/20

Revenue Signals

7.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

7.5/15

Solo Buildability

7.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] AI/ML [medium] Frontend [low]

Dashboard