Inheritance Scenario Comparator

3.60

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Asset succession simulation

→

Step 2 Scenario-based inheritance and gift tax after-tax comparison

→

Step 3 Visualization of net amount differences by inheritance timing and method across family members

Problem

Asset holders aged 55-65 with 2-3 properties and financial assets who want to transfer wealth to their children must pay $375-$750 in Tax Accounting consultation fees just to compare the after-tax net amounts for 'gift now vs. inherit in 10 years vs. phased gifting.' Without professional consultation, they have no way to gauge which scenario is favorable, delaying decisions by months—during which time changes in officially assessed property values can shift tax liability by tens of thousands of dollars.

Solution

Enter officially assessed property values, financial assets, and insurance payouts on the web to automatically calculate inheritance tax, gift tax, and acquisition tax across three scenarios—immediate gift, 10-year phased gifting, and posthumous inheritance—displayed as a per-family-member net amount comparison table and timeline chart. Officially assessed property prices are auto-populated via Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport open data.

Target: Ages 55-65, owning 1+ properties with financial assets, 2+ adult children, planning pre- or post-Retirement asset transfer

Revenue Model: Basic simulation Free. Detailed PDF Report (including tax optimization strategies per scenario) at ~$3.75 Per Transaction. Tax Accounting referral commission on connection.

Ecosystem Role: Supplier

MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty

3.0/5

U Urgency

4.0/5

M Market

4.0/5

R Realizability

4.0/5

V Validation

3.0/5

NUMR-V Scoring System

N Novelty	1-5	How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency	1-5	How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market	1-5	Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability	1-5	Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation	1-5	Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.

SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (70%)

Tech Complexity

29.3/40

Data Availability

20.6/25

MVP Timeline

20.0/20

API Bonus

0.0/15

Feasibility Breakdown

Tech Complexity	/ 40	Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability	/ 25	Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline	/ 20	Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus	/ 15	Bonus for viable public API leverage.

Market Validation (56/100)

Competition

8.0/20

Market Demand

6.2/20

Timing

14.0/20

Revenue Signals

10.5/15

Pick-Axe Fit

10.5/15

Solo Buildability

7.0/10

Validation Breakdown

Competition	/ 20	Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand	/ 20	Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing	/ 20	Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals	/ 15	Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit	/ 15	How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability	/ 10	Practicality for lean-team implementation.

Technical Requirements

Frontend [medium] Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [low]

Dashboard