B

Critical Mineral Import Diversification Matcher

2.70

Derivation Chain

Step 1 Korea-Brazil summit: institutionalization of critical mineral cooperation
→
Step 2 Growing number of SME manufacturers pursuing critical mineral import diversification
→
Step 3 Cross-country critical mineral supply comparison and matching Platform for SME manufacturers

Problem

SME manufacturers (10–50 employees) using secondary battery and semiconductor materials want to reduce dependence on China by finding alternative mineral import sources, but comparing mineral quality, pricing, and logistics conditions across countries takes 2–4 weeks per case. Information on emerging supplier countries like Brazil is unavailable in Korean, incurring additional costs to translate English/Portuguese sources.

Solution

A Korean-language dashboard comparing suppliers, prices, quality grades, and logistics lead times across 20 critical minerals (lithium, nickel, cobalt, rare earth elements, etc.) by country + automatic FTA/tariff benefit calculations + supplier matching request functionality.

Target: Procurement/sourcing managers at SME manufacturers (10–50 employees) using secondary battery, semiconductor, and electronic component materials
Revenue Model: SaaS monthly flat rate of 99,000 KRW (~$74)/company + 0.5% commission on transaction value upon successful supplier match; basic search is Free
Ecosystem Role: Infrastructure
MVP Estimate: 2_weeks

NUMR-V Scores

N Novelty
3.0/5
U Urgency
3.0/5
M Market
3.0/5
R Realizability
2.0/5
V Validation
3.0/5
NUMR-V Scoring System
N Novelty1-5How uncommon the service is in market context.
U Urgency1-5How urgently users need this problem solved now.
M Market1-5Market size and growth potential from proxy indicators.
R Realizability1-5Buildability for a small team with realistic constraints.
V Validation1-5Validation signal quality from competition and demand data.
Each dimension is scored 1-5 and weighted into grade S/A/B/C/D.
SaaS N=.15 U=.20 M=.15 R=.30 V=.20 Senior N=.25 U=.25 M=.05 R=.30 V=.15

Feasibility (70%)

Tech Complexity
29.3/40
Data Availability
20.4/25
MVP Timeline
20.0/20
API Bonus
0.0/15
Feasibility Breakdown
Tech Complexity/ 40Difficulty of core implementation stack.
Data Availability/ 25Practical availability and cost of required data.
MVP Timeline/ 20Expected time to ship a usable MVP.
API Bonus/ 15Bonus for viable public API leverage.
Total 100 points; below 50% is filtered out.

Market Validation (58/100)

Competition
8.0/20
Market Demand
6.2/20
Timing
20.0/20
Revenue Signals
10.5/15
Pick-Axe Fit
10.5/15
Solo Buildability
3.0/10
Validation Breakdown
Competition/ 20Signal quality from competitor landscape.
Market Demand/ 20Demand proxies from search and mention patterns.
Timing/ 20Fit with current shifts in tech, behavior, and regulation.
Revenue Signals/ 15Reference evidence for monetization viability.
Pick-Axe Fit/ 15How well the concept serves participants in a trend.
Solo Buildability/ 10Practicality for lean-team implementation.
Total 100 points; below 50 is filtered out.

Technical Requirements

Backend [medium] Data Pipeline [medium] Frontend [low]
Dashboard